⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Short-circuit evaluation and lazy filtering#334
⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Short-circuit evaluation and lazy filtering#334acebytes wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…iltering Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Closing as duplicate. The Bolt bot has opened many PRs for the same lazy-filter / short-circuit / array-allocation optimizations in |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is a duplicate and stopping work on this task. |
💡 What: Optimize collection processing by chaining
.lazy.filterbefore.reduceand.count, and using.contains(where:)instead of checking.isEmptyon filtered arrays.🎯 Why: Prevent intermediate array allocations and reduce memory churn.
📊 Impact: O(1) space complexity instead of O(n) space complexity when computing sizes and selection flags, which makes UI more responsive and reduces memory usage on each computed property access.
🔬 Measurement: The UI should feel snappier, and memory profile should show fewer temporary array allocations in instruments.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 14061225682923521052 started by @acebytes