CGC Rough Consensus 议事办法（内部讨论稿） - #96
Open
xiaoxin2140 wants to merge 7 commits into
Open
Conversation
- 四阶段流程: 立案 -> 公示/温度检查(7天) -> 上会集体共识判定(陪审团式) -> 执行归档 - 共识判定由每周 CGC 参会人员集体作出, 轮值主持人主持, 结论写入会议纪要 - 提案人任主持人时回避; 反对须附实质理由; 判定 label 化留痕 - 链上 veJ 投票保留给重大事项; 与 WP specs 三层把关互不冲突 发起: 教链 J-25 | 起草: 小新 | 2026-08-25
Contributor
Author
|
@hmisty 请 review 🙏 内部讨论稿：CGC GitHub rough consensus 议事办法。核心机制：公示 7 天（反对须附理由）→ 每周 CGC 会陪审团式集体判定 → 结论入纪要。文档第 4 节列了 5 个开放问题，欢迎直接在 PR 评论或上会讨论。 |
- 本质性界定: 陪审团仅判定 GitHub 公示是否达成 rough consensus(程序性裁决), 不对提案实质作接受/拒绝决定; 实质判断权在社区公示讨论 - 法定人数: 出席(含主持人) >=3 且为奇数; 不足顺延; 僵持时简单多数投票判决 - 开放问题 Jouleverse#1 已解决并标记 发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
- 新增 §0: 双轨治理架构(Core/Eco 去中心化平行, 财政 core timelock vs eco timelock 创世锁定, 共识机制 CGC rough consensus vs veJ 链上自决)与适用范围(仅 Core) - 立案阶段限定事项须属 Core 职责; Eco 事项走 veJ 自决 - 表态资格重定位: 非 Core 意见仅参考, 无程序性权利 - §3 重写: 与 veJ 投票为平行域关系, 不存在跨轨升级 - 设计要点表新增 Eco 事务处理行; 开放问题 Jouleverse#4 已解决标记 - 版本号 v0.1 -> v0.2 发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
- 陪审团判定改为两步程序裁决: 先判管辖权(不属 Core 轨则 invalidate 关闭), 再判共识是否达成 - 废除"发回修改"判决: 未达成共识即 not-concluded 关闭归档, 提案人可自行修改后重新立案(新 issue 注明前案), 不构成承诺 - label 更新: invalid / approved / approved-with-objections / not-concluded - 设计要点表同步; 边界重申: 陪审团永不触碰提案实质 发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
xiaoxin2140
changed the title
- 在指定 issue/PR 跟帖回复: J-{CoreID} 赞成/反对 (ACK/NACK)
- 反对必须写明理由, 无实质理由不计入考量
- 疑问/保留可自由表述
- 附示例
发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
- 从 bullet 列表提出, 置于 §1.3 标题正下方, 块引用加粗警示 - 强调: 陪审团仅判定 rough consensus 是否形成, 永不触碰提案实质 - 避免被大量 bullets 淹没导致理解偏差 发起: 教链 J-25 | 2026-08-25
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
摘要
新增
cgc-github-rough-consensus-draft.md—— 依托 GitHub 形成 rough consensus 的 CGC 议事操作办法（内部讨论稿 v0.1）。发起：教链(J-25)｜起草：小新｜2026-08-25核心设计
四阶段流程（每议题 = 1 个 issue + 1 个 PR）：
定位与关系
开放问题（见文档第 4 节，欢迎评论）
陪审团最低出席人数、「重大事项」是否成文枚举、公示期档位、非 Core 强烈反对的升级条件、本办法自身的修订流程。