Skip to content

docs(eval): publish post-merge baseline and next product fix - #72

Open
jack-arturo wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
test/postmerge-baseline
Open

jack-arturo wants to merge 8 commits into
mainfrom
test/postmerge-baseline

Conversation

@jack-arturo

@jack-arturo jack-arturo commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Publish the completed frozen comparison for control 01a17aa and candidate 3eaa1f5. Both 30-question LongMemEval canaries score 21/30. Candidate LongMemEval-S scores 427/500 (85.4%; six-task macro 83.60%), and canonical LoCoMo scores 1690/1986 (85.10%), including 444 judge calls with zero errors/skips. Equal canaries and unchanged ranked retrieved IDs support no causal score-gain claim.

Free paired diagnostics retain ForgetEval 234/385 and PMB 11/77 single, 0/12 session with no new assertion failures. Targeted lifecycle, tag and enrichment interleavings confirm write-path fixes. Full inline relations still expose obsolete content in all five supersede fixtures; automem-evals#31 is the selected next bounded fix, then one precision experiment and matched graph on/off. Keep automem#270 separately open and AMB/BEAM/adapters/architecture parked.

All four paid stages pass native exact-ID/contract/checkpoint gates. A disposable storage interruption quarantined 260 LoCoMo rows; the exact 497-row prefix was retained and the affected conversation rerun. Both finalized accepted windows (497+1489) audit clean. All failed and repeated costs remain included: $9.809397650 accounted, including $0.073130570 ambiguous liability, leaving $10.190602350 of the original $20. Twelve closed ledger copies match byte-for-byte. Official engineering metadata lives in verygoodplugins/automem#272; shared cost guard in #71.

The report, 494-row fixture audit and one completed registry record carry the product decision. Companion #73 refreshes all three generated dashboard files and preserves all 16 historical score records, including 12 populated results and their original configurations. Merge #73 into this branch FIRST, then merge this PR into main. This PR remains blocked until that prerequisite lands.

Validation: full native results and independent accepted-window audits passed; 34 offline metadata-builder and 24 projector checks passed; 14 dashboard-history tests passed, including exact history preservation, real-CLI malformed-source rejection and the documented safe refresh entrypoint. Earlier engineering suites remain recorded in the report. Production migration/repair is outside this batch. No merge or auto-merge enabled.

Implementation harness: Codex desktop. GitHub identity: configured connected account.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added the babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head label Oct 22, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-23T02:34:31.880263Z 56b08e8 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:active Babysit agent is actively working this PR and removed babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head labels Oct 22, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: f7749739ad

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

# Experiment Status

Generated: `2026-06-22T20:26:29+00:00`
Historical AMB snapshot: LoCoMo, PersonaMem, BEAM-100K values retained from the index generated 2026-06-22T20:26:29+00:00 because the raw archives are unavailable. These are historical values, not fresh AMB results. Source: origin/main@35fa73d, docs/experiments/index.json; full source commit/hash recorded per retained row in index.json.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Commit the refreshed machine index

The commit updates the generated STATUS/scoreboard to the October campaign and states that per-row provenance is available in index.json, but docs/experiments/index.json is unchanged from its June version: it contains no EXP-POSTMERGE-20261022 thread, artifact_overlay_root, or score_provenance fields. Any tooling or reviewer consuming the checked-in machine index therefore receives stale data that contradicts both generated views; commit the index produced by the same refresh run.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L95-L98

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The matching machine index and both generated human views are in stacked companion #73 at verified head e6cee41, with a current-head Codex 👍 and all review findings resolved. Its base is this branch at56b08e833b54c653bcbbafcb74f2379a5a51f05d, which also has a current-head clean review. Both descriptions require merging #73 INTO this branch FIRST, then merging #72 into main. Leaving this dependency finding open and #72 blocked until the prerequisite lands, so the registry, report and all three generated views reach main together. The baseline is complete. No merge or auto-merge has been performed.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head and removed babysit:active Babysit agent is actively working this PR labels Oct 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Babysit stopped — wait. Verified head f774973 has one valid P1 dependency: merge #73 into test/postmerge-baseline first so the generated machine index accompanies this report and its human views. Then re-check this PR's new head before merging #72 into main. The 12 offline history tests and existing runner checks pass; CI is not configured in this repository. No merge or auto-merge has been enabled.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:blocked Babysit stopped; unresolved blocker needs human and removed babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head labels Oct 22, 2026 — with ChatGPT Codex Connector

jack-arturo commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Baseline batch COMPLETE. LongMemEval canaries: 21/30 each. Candidate full LongMemEval: 427/500 (85.4%; six-task macro 83.60%). Canonical LoCoMo: 1690/1986 (85.10%), 444 judge calls, zero errors/skips. All native and finalized accepted-window gates passed. Accounted $9.809397650 including $0.073130570 retained ambiguous liability; remaining $10.190602350 of the original $20. Twelve closed ledger copies and the sealed 222-file bundle verify. All owned paid runtime has been removed.

Current #72 head 56b08e8 has a current-head Codex 👍. Fourteen local wrapper/history tests pass, including malformed-source rejection and the safe refresh hint. This repo has no benchmark CI workflow; its label-only helper is not counted as validation.

BLOCKER class wait/dependency: the matching three generated dashboard files are in companion #73 (current head e6cee41), based on this branch. Merge #73 INTO test/postmerge-baseline FIRST, then merge #72 into main. The original P1 machine-index dependency remains open until that merge; do not merge #72 first. No GitHub merge or auto-merge has been performed. Selected product follow-up: automem-evals#31; automem#270 stays separate.

@jack-arturo jack-arturo changed the title docs(eval): record paired post-merge diagnostics and next fix docs(eval): publish post-merge baseline and next product fix Oct 23, 2026

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5c7a454e14

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread data/results/postmerge-20261022/refresh_dashboard.py
@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:active Babysit agent is actively working this PR and removed babysit:blocked Babysit stopped; unresolved blocker needs human labels Oct 23, 2026
@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head and removed babysit:active Babysit agent is actively working this PR labels Oct 23, 2026
@jack-arturo jack-arturo added babysit:blocked Babysit stopped; unresolved blocker needs human and removed babysit:waiting-codex 👀 Codex reviewing current head labels Oct 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

babysit:blocked Babysit stopped; unresolved blocker needs human

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant