REL 1.30 - Update documentation#68
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 26 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe site version and release metadata are updated to 1.30.2. Installation, developer, processor, CLI, GUI, and plugin documentation are revised, including updated dependency versions, installer examples, and Greenfield-related guidance. ChangesVersion and documentation updates
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
install/index.md (1)
97-99: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winAlign the automated-installation example with the package selection. In
install/index.md,veraPDF Sample Pluginsis deselected in the XML (selected="false"), but the sample output still shows it as[ Processing package: veraPDF Sample Plugins (4/4) ]. Either select the pack or change the output to stop at 3/3.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@install/index.md` around lines 97 - 99, Align the automated-installation example by making the package selection and sample output consistent: either set the veraPDF Sample Plugins pack to selected="true" and retain the 4/4 output, or keep it deselected and update the output to stop at 3/3.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
develop/index.md (1)
44-54: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueImprove phrasing and grammar.
Consider adjusting the phrasing for better readability and grammatical correctness by adding the missing article before "alternative dependency" and replacing "accordingly" with "respectively".
💡 Proposed text improvements
-The implementation above depends on javax. If your project uses jakarta, you should use alternative dependency: +The implementation above depends on javax. If your project uses jakarta, you should use the alternative dependency: ```xml <dependency> <groupId>org.verapdf</groupId> <artifactId>validation-model-jakarta</artifactId> <version>1.30.2</version> </dependency>-If your project uses
coreorverapdf-librarydependencies, they also have alternative jakarta versions (core-jakartaorverapdf-library-jakartaaccordingly).
+If your project usescoreorverapdf-librarydependencies, they also have alternative jakarta versions (core-jakartaandverapdf-library-jakartarespectively).</details> <details> <summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.In
@develop/index.mdaround lines 44 - 54, Improve the dependency guidance
prose: add the missing article before “alternative dependency” in the
javax/jakarta explanation, and update the final sentence to paircore-jakarta
withcoreandverapdf-library-jakartawithverapdf-libraryusing
“respectively” instead of “accordingly.”</details> <!-- cr-comment:v1:4754fe36db333abf518b86af --> </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents</summary>Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.Outside diff comments:
In@install/index.md:
- Around line 97-99: Align the automated-installation example by making the
package selection and sample output consistent: either set the veraPDF Sample
Plugins pack to selected="true" and retain the 4/4 output, or keep it deselected
and update the output to stop at 3/3.
Nitpick comments:
In@develop/index.md:
- Around line 44-54: Improve the dependency guidance prose: add the missing
article before “alternative dependency” in the javax/jakarta explanation, and
update the final sentence to paircore-jakartawithcoreand
verapdf-library-jakartawithverapdf-libraryusing “respectively” instead of
“accordingly.”</details> --- <details> <summary>ℹ️ Review info</summary> <details> <summary>⚙️ Run configuration</summary> **Configuration used**: defaults **Review profile**: CHILL **Plan**: Pro **Run ID**: `5d6f1f2e-6f13-4bb4-8783-0df9862d2ba6` </details> <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eefebad451600afb6651c5fcc1b8b808d276b10c and 75ee997cb919999f5014a9e8af2d889e0c25f5cd. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (7)</summary> * `_config.yml` * `cli/fixing/index.md` * `develop/index.md` * `gui/index.md` * `install/index.md` * `plugins/index.md` * `policy/info-dict/report.xml` </details> <details> <summary>🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)</summary> * _config.yml </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit