Skip to content

feat(packageManager): expose rundown piece content status to peripher…#6

Merged
kubo6472 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/core-re-content-status-api-a043
Jul 17, 2026
Merged

feat(packageManager): expose rundown piece content status to peripher…#6
kubo6472 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/core-re-content-status-api-a043

Conversation

@kubo6472

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

…al devices

Add peripheralDevice.packageManager.getContentStatusForRundown, reusing checkPieceContentStatus.ts for PieceStatusCode computation. Returns a minimal per-piece payload (externalId, statusCode, ready, reason) scoped to the calling device's studio — intended for Rundown Editor hybrid readiness without subscribing to uiPieceContentStatuses.

About the Contributor

Type of Contribution

This is a:

Bug fix / Feature / Code improvement / Documentation improvement / Other (please specify)

Current Behavior

New Behavior

Testing

  • I have added one or more unit tests for this PR
  • I have updated the relevant unit tests
  • No unit test changes are needed for this PR

Affected areas

Time Frame

Other Information

Status

  • PR is ready to be reviewed.
  • The functionality has been tested by the author.
  • Relevant unit tests has been added / updated.
  • Relevant documentation (code comments, system documentation) has been added / updated.

…al devices

Add peripheralDevice.packageManager.getContentStatusForRundown, reusing
checkPieceContentStatus.ts for PieceStatusCode computation. Returns a
minimal per-piece payload (externalId, statusCode, ready, reason) scoped
to the calling device's studio — intended for Rundown Editor hybrid
readiness without subscribing to uiPieceContentStatuses.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@kubo6472, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 28 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 3afbcfd5-3d22-4a12-8ffc-7a899beac9ee

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9100611 and 2686035.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • meteor/server/api/integration/rundownContentStatus.ts
  • meteor/server/api/peripheralDevice.ts
  • packages/shared-lib/src/peripheralDevice/methodsAPI.ts
  • packages/shared-lib/src/peripheralDevice/rundownContentStatus.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch cursor/core-re-content-status-api-a043

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kubo6472
kubo6472 merged commit dfc25cc into main Jul 17, 2026
33 of 43 checks passed
@kubo6472
kubo6472 deleted the cursor/core-re-content-status-api-a043 branch July 17, 2026 09:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants