Skip to content

chore(flows): bump vendored tinyflows → 0.5.1 (dotted-path split_out)#4608

Merged
senamakel merged 3 commits into
tinyhumansai:mainfrom
graycyrus:feat/flows-bump-tinyflows-dotted-split
Jul 6, 2026
Merged

chore(flows): bump vendored tinyflows → 0.5.1 (dotted-path split_out)#4608
senamakel merged 3 commits into
tinyhumansai:mainfrom
graycyrus:feat/flows-bump-tinyflows-dotted-split

Conversation

@graycyrus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumps the vendored tinyflows submodule to 0.5.1 (tinyhumansai/tinyflows#4): split_out now resolves dotted paths, so a fan-out can reach an array nested inside a tool_call's {json,text,raw} envelopepath="json.data.messages" walks envelope → tool result → the array (e.g. GMAIL_FETCH_EMAILS's list at data.messages).

Pairs with #4605 (live tool-contract grounding): #4605 teaches the builder to write the correct json.<primary_array_path> via the tool's real output schema; this bump makes the engine traverse it. Together, fetch → split_out → per-item agent finally passes real data (fixes the null-cascade in the classify-emails flow).

Backward compatible: single-segment paths (path="items") unchanged. cargo check clean with 0.5.1.

⚠️ Depends on tinyhumansai/tinyflows#4 merging first (submodule pin).

…t_out)

Pulls tinyhumansai/tinyflows#4: split_out now resolves dotted paths, so a fan-out
can reach an array nested inside a tool_call's {json,text,raw} envelope
(path='json.data.messages'). Pairs with the live-tool-contract grounding (tinyhumansai#4605),
which teaches the builder to write that exact path via the tool's primary_array_path
— together they make fetch → split → per-item agent actually pass data.

cargo check clean with 0.5.1 (backward compatible; single-segment paths unchanged).
@graycyrus graycyrus requested a review from a team July 6, 2026 21:24
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 29 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 823e01cf-52fc-44d2-8acb-4b651401eb62

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b84f96 and bf8f0c9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
  • app/src-tauri/Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • vendor/tinyflows

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 83229966b5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread Cargo.lock
[[package]]
name = "tinyflows"
version = "0.5.0"
version = "0.5.1"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Regenerate the Tauri lockfile for the tinyflows bump

This updates the root lockfile to tinyflows 0.5.1, but the Tauri shell is a separate Cargo world and app/src-tauri/Cargo.toml also depends on ../../vendor/tinyflows; its committed app/src-tauri/Cargo.lock still records tinyflows as 0.5.0. In locked/frozen Tauri cargo invocations, and in tooling that audits or releases from the committed Tauri lockfile, the lockfile is now inconsistent with the vendored package and misses the 0.5.1 metadata. Please regenerate and commit app/src-tauri/Cargo.lock alongside this bump.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in bf8f0c9 — regenerated app/src-tauri/Cargo.lock with a targeted bump of the tinyflows entry to 0.5.1 (verified cargo check --manifest-path app/src-tauri/Cargo.toml --locked passes). Kept the diff to just the version line since tinyflows's own dependency footprint is unchanged between 0.5.0 and 0.5.1.

graycyrus added 2 commits July 7, 2026 03:09
…split_out)

tinyhumansai/tinyflows#4 squash-merged; pin to the main commit instead of the
feature-branch commit so CI resolves the submodule cleanly.
@senamakel senamakel merged commit d84519f into tinyhumansai:main Jul 6, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants