Open
Conversation
* use c++11 instead of boost as mush as it possible
* use std cstdint instead of boost
* use std cstdint instead of boost * use std thread
* use std thread
* use std random
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! For my project I had ported as much as possible boost-specific code to standard c++ library without changing any logic. It requires modern c++ std lib and standalone asio version. You can merge this changes in unstable branch if you wish(all tests are ok but not really sure that they cover 100% of functionality). If compatibility with old compilers is crucial then you can just ignore this request