Skip to content

Auto-assign, label, and CC lang-docs (+FLS) and edition - #158424

Open
traviscross wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
traviscross:TC/auto-assign-label-cc-lang-docs-and-edition
Open

Auto-assign, label, and CC lang-docs (+FLS) and edition#158424
traviscross wants to merge 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
traviscross:TC/auto-assign-label-cc-lang-docs-and-edition

Conversation

@traviscross

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The documentation on primitives, attributes, and keywords is language documentation and should be kept synchronized with the Reference. When these files are touched, let's add the T-lang-docs label, CC the team (and the FLS team), and assign the issue to a team member. (For attribute documentation, we'll also include Guillaume in the rotation as he's been working on this.)

For bandwidth reasons, we may still reroll assignment to libs or compiler for ordinary matters. We'll see. The primitive_docs.rs file churns the most and is the one we'd be most likely to hand back.

When the submodule pointer for a book owned by lang-docs or edition is updated, let's CC the team and add the correct label.

For edition, we want changes to compiler/rustc_span/src/edition.rs and the tests in tests/ui/editions to cause the T-edition label to be applied and the team to be pinged; this arranges for that as well.

r? ehuss

cc @rust-lang/lang-docs @rust-lang/fls @rust-lang/edition

The documentation on primitives, attributes, and keywords is language
documentation and should be kept synchronized with the Reference.
When these files are touched, let's add the `T-lang-docs` label, CC
the team (and the FLS team), and assign the issue to a team member.
(For attribute documentation, we'll also include Guillaume in the
rotation as he's been working on this.)

For bandwidth reasons, we may still reroll assignment to libs or
compiler for ordinary matters.  We'll see.  The `primitive_docs.rs`
file churns the most and is the one we'd be most likely to hand back.

When the submodule pointer for a book owned by lang-docs or edition is
updated, let's CC the team and add the correct label.

For edition, we want changes to `compiler/rustc_span/src/edition.rs`
and the tests in `tests/ui/editions` to cause the `T-edition` label to
be applied and the team to be pinged; this arranges for that as well.
@traviscross traviscross added T-lang-docs Relevant to the lang-docs team. T-edition Relevant to the edition team. T-fls Relevant to the FLS team. labels Jun 25, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jun 25, 2026
@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #159579) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts by rebasing.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm personally happy to see this happen. I think we can see how responsive lang-docs is in practice (i.e., what the tradeoff is on contributor experience from a smaller group being the primary assignee). I think long-term the right path is probably for lang-relevant aspects of this to move out to the reference or other material, but for now it seems fine.

(Essentially my short take is that if lang-docs wants to help with a subset of reviews that seems totally reasonable to me).

Nominating for libs in case there are any objections.

@rustbot label +I-libs-nominated

View changes since this review

Comment thread triagebot.toml

[mentions."src/doc/nomicon"]
message = "A language documentation submodule was updated."
cc = ["@rust-lang/lang-docs"]

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know how much value there is in this since the changes have already been reviewed upstream in the nomicon (and same for the reference below).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I was on the fence about this part too. The risk of noise isn't so much from the intended submodule bumps as from where people accidentally bump it on unrelated PRs.

@rustbot rustbot added the I-libs-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs team meeting. label Jul 28, 2026
@nia-e

nia-e commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Per today's libs meeting, we're okay with this so long as it's just those three files being touched ^^ thanks!

@nia-e nia-e removed the I-libs-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs team meeting. label Jul 29, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-edition Relevant to the edition team. T-fls Relevant to the FLS team. T-lang-docs Relevant to the lang-docs team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants