Repository navigation
Advisory Creation WORKFLOW Loose-Ends #1133
Description
Activity
Should we add ML for PR reviews?
- changed the title
[-]Advisory Upfront WORKFLOW Loose-Ends[/-][+]RAD Advisory Creation WORKFLOW Loose-Ends[/+]on Jun 22, 2026 FYI: Advisories are getting longer description field with more sections.
Probably need to flag ## Details section etc just like POC.- changed the title
[-]RAD Advisory Creation WORKFLOW Loose-Ends[/-][+]Advisory Creation WORKFLOW Loose-Ends[/+]on Jun 26, 2026 Checked EUVD database this morning for "ruby" or "rubygem" advisories - found 33 - already had 21 - looks at the 12 "new" - 4 really there and 8 "not gems".
Currently checking gem projects' "security/advisories" for missing advisories.
Yesterday found GHSL advisories yesteray - see PR#1187 for details
- Found 1 non-gem advisory - updated rad-ignores.sh file.
- Added to 5 existing advisories.
- Skipped 3 GHSL advisories because of unclear release.
Getting tired of touching advisories twice when filenames changes. 22 days before my version and global GHSA version.
- locked and limited conversation to collaborators
on Aug 25, 2026
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
Advisory Creation WORKFLOW Loose-Ends
titleanddescriptionlline length check) (UPDATE: PR#1135/Canceled/Deferrred)kwalifygem (Keep for now)cvssfields/values from https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln .NOTE: Expect to keep current for now.