Support phase weights and optional hand inversion - #360
Draft
tjlane wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
! This PR was vibe-coded.
Stack
Part 10 of 11 for #31. Depends on #359. Merge bottom-up.
Final PR: #349.
What this implements
Extends align_phases() with amplitude-product or explicit uniform weighting, paired Weight-typed FOM columns, intensity-to-amplitude conversion, and opt-in hand inversion. Hand search remains off by default and separate from proper reindexing.
When hand inversion or an origin shift is selected, all Phase and complex columns are transformed consistently in the returned copy.
Tests
Tests cover FOM multiplication and range checks, paired FOM keys, intensity equivalence, opt-in hand selection, complex-column recovery, and the default proper-hand behavior.
Reviewer focus
Related: #31 and #174.