Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @strantalis, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces an AGENTS.md file, which serves as a repository guideline for developers. The document is well-structured and covers key areas like project structure, development commands, coding style, and contribution guidelines. My review focuses on improving the clarity and efficiency of the local development workflow described in the document. I've suggested changes to the dependency installation and local testing commands to make them more efficient by avoiding redundant installation steps. Overall, this is a valuable addition to the project's documentation.
| ## Build, Test, and Development Commands | ||
|
|
||
| - Enter the dev environment: `devbox shell` (installs Python/JDK/Node per `devbox.json`). | ||
| - Install xtest deps: `python -m pip install -r xtest/requirements.txt` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To improve the local development workflow, consider including the linting and type-checking tools in this installation step. This avoids reinstalling them every time the checks are run (as per the command on line 27) and centralizes dependency management.
| - Install xtest deps: `python -m pip install -r xtest/requirements.txt` | |
| - Install xtest deps & tools: `python -m pip install -r xtest/requirements.txt ruff black pyright` |
| - `ruff check` | ||
| - `black --check .` | ||
| - `pyright` | ||
| - Local equivalent: `cd xtest && python -m pip install -r requirements.txt && python -m pip install ruff black pyright && ruff check && black --check . && pyright` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If the linting tools are installed as part of the main dependency setup (as suggested for line 13), this command can be simplified to only run the checks. This makes the local check process faster and the command easier to read.
| - Local equivalent: `cd xtest && python -m pip install -r requirements.txt && python -m pip install ruff black pyright && ruff check && black --check . && pyright` | |
| - Local equivalent: `cd xtest && ruff check && black --check . && pyright` |
X-Test Results✅ go-v0.4.34 |
1 participant
No description provided.