Skip to content

Production E2E: expect shared artifact records from the operator console - #1871

Merged
mishrasanjeev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/e2e-shared-artifact-cache
Oct 30, 2026
Merged

mishrasanjeev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/e2e-shared-artifact-cache

Conversation

@mishrasanjeev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Why

The production E2E after the 61f6806 release ran 728 tests: 727 passed and one failed. The failing test is commerce-runtime-demo.spec.ts:250, which got Expected: "buyer_agent_demo", Received: undefined on the artifact cache call.

What changes

The spec now expects the cache call to carry artifacts and no buyer. The buyer's ask call still carries buyer_agent_demo with non_binding_preview.

Tests

The spec was run against the production UI. Its API calls are mocked by the spec.

  • With this change: 1 passed.
  • With the old assertion: 1 failed, with the same Expected/Received as the production run.

…red records

#1866 made the operator console cache issued merchant artifacts without a buyer,
so the public catalog and every buyer read them, and updated the unit test. The
production regression spec still expected the buyer on the cache call; it went
unnoticed while every post-deploy run aborted at load. It now expects shared
records (artifacts, no buyer), and the buyer's ask still carries the buyer.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-30T04:02:13.605495Z ba56dd9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@mishrasanjeev
mishrasanjeev merged commit 2d86fc3 into main Oct 30, 2026
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant