Skip to content

Conversation

@i7an
Copy link
Contributor

@i7an i7an commented Jan 29, 2026

Motivation

Add yard dependencies to the Gemfile so you can run yard server.

Changes

  • Add yard dependencies

How to test

  • Run yard doc and yard server

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced README with improved formatting and clearer structure.
    • Added guidance for generating and running documentation locally.
  • Chores

    • Added new project dependencies.
    • Updated CI/CD workflow configuration.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@i7an i7an requested review from DagonWat and mklocek January 29, 2026 16:00
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates GitHub Actions workflow triggers with branch filtering for main, adds three new Ruby dependencies (rack, rackup, webrick) to the Gemfile, and enhances README documentation with instructions for generating and serving local documentation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow
.github/workflows/main.yml
Replaced shorthand trigger syntax with explicit block format, adding branch filter for push events to main while keeping pull_request unfiltered.
Dependencies
Gemfile
Added three new gems: rack, rackup, and webrick to expand project dependencies.
Documentation
README.md
Reformatted paragraphs with adjusted line breaks and added guidance for generating and serving local documentation using yard commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • mklocek
  • IgorDobryn
  • DagonWat

Poem

🐰 Through workflows we bound with expanded delight,
New gems in our toolbox shine ever so bright,
With yard commands documented and clear,
The path to the finish now draws itself near! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add yard dependencies' directly aligns with the primary change in the changeset - adding yard-related gems to the Gemfile.
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description includes Motivation and Changes sections as required, with a How to test section containing test checkboxes, though it lacks the optional Images and GIFs section.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@README.md`:
- Line 236: The sentence starting "Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an
unofficial client..." uses the adverb "completely" awkwardly; edit that sentence
to replace "completely" with "entirely" or remove the adverb (e.g., "Package
version 3 is an entirely new package." or "Package version 3 is a new package.")
to improve wording and clarity.

## Compatibility with previous releases

Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [@vchin](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is a completely new package. No newline at end of file
Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [@vchin](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is a completely new package.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Minor wording polish.
Line 236: consider replacing “completely” with “entirely” or dropping the adverb.

✍️ Suggested edit
-Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [`@vchin`](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is a completely new package. 
+Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [`@vchin`](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is an entirely new package.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [@vchin](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is a completely new package.
Versions of this package up to 2.0.2 were an [unofficial client](https://github.com/vchin/mailtrap-client) developed by [`@vchin`](https://github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is an entirely new package.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~236-~236: Consider using a different adverb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...github.com/vchin). Package version 3 is a completely new package.

(COMPLETELY_ENTIRELY)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@README.md` at line 236, The sentence starting "Versions of this package up to
2.0.2 were an unofficial client..." uses the adverb "completely" awkwardly; edit
that sentence to replace "completely" with "entirely" or remove the adverb
(e.g., "Package version 3 is an entirely new package." or "Package version 3 is
a new package.") to improve wording and clarity.

@i7an i7an merged commit 6e18102 into main Feb 3, 2026
4 checks passed
@i7an i7an deleted the yard-dependencies branch February 3, 2026 13:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants