Skip to content

Conversation

@roystgnr
Copy link
Member

Experimenting with ChatGPT Codex led it to suggest that this was "low hanging fruit" for adding libMesh test coverage. I didn't like its suggestion for a new test so I wrote this instead.

@moosebuild
Copy link

moosebuild commented Jan 13, 2026

Job Coverage, step Generate coverage on ea787db wanted to post the following:

Coverage

63cf6d #4365 ea787d
Total Total +/- New
Rate 65.27% 65.28% +0.02% -
Hits 77395 77413 +18 0
Misses 41184 41166 -18 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

This comment will be updated on new commits.

Copy link
Member

@jwpeterson jwpeterson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coverage says -3 hits/+3 misses after adding a new test?

@roystgnr
Copy link
Member Author

The coverage decrease was a fluke, but yeah, the coverage increase is only 3 lines. I expanded the testing a little bit, but now it looks like I may need to kick something to get past the "inconsistent report tags"; I'll try rebasing.

@moosebuild
Copy link

Job Test 32bit on 5620291 : invalidated by @roystgnr

Experimenting with ChatGPT Codex led it to suggest that this was "low
hanging fruit" for adding libMesh test coverage.  I didn't like its
suggestion for a new test so I wrote this instead.
@roystgnr roystgnr force-pushed the out_of_mesh_coverage branch from 5620291 to ea787db Compare January 13, 2026 23:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants