fix: route new validation requirements to follow-up work - #1277
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Intent
Ship only the one-sentence AGENTS.md section 7 rule that, once validation starts, new requirements normally become follow-up work rather than expanding the current task, except when a new requirement completely invalidates the work being validated, while corrections required to satisfy already accepted intent remain part of the current task. Preserve the minimal instruction-only scope: change only top-level AGENTS.md, add no helper, script, test, skill, duplicated policy, or unrelated wording, and do not merge the PR.
What Changed
Risk Assessment
✅ Low: The change is a well-bounded, one-sentence addition to the authoritative top-level AGENTS.md and accurately preserves all required distinctions without unrelated changes or duplicated policy.
Testing
Inspected the complete base-to-target diff and commit shape, ran focused structural and exact-copy assertions, rendered and visually inspected the affected Section 7 reading surface, and confirmed the worktree remained clean; all targeted checks passed.
/var/folders/5x/4nqprlbx0518k3ybcb1sz6gr0000gn/T/no-mistakes-evidence/01KYR3WYK9ZVBATYG443AWWHFN/AGENTS-section-7-validation-rule.html.png)Evidence: Reviewer-visible rendered HTML evidence
Pipeline
Updates from git push no-mistakes
✅ **intent** - passed
✅ No issues found.
✅ **Rebase** - passed
✅ No issues found.
✅ **Review** - passed
✅ No issues found.
✅ **Test** - passed
✅ No issues found.
git diff --name-status c21bf547511cf983628eb07d5fb57f931baee21f 7cc9aacf71d76600e112070c69315c81639066cegit diff --stat c21bf547511cf983628eb07d5fb57f931baee21f 7cc9aacf71d76600e112070c69315c81639066cegit diff --unified=20 c21bf547511cf983628eb07d5fb57f931baee21f 7cc9aacf71d76600e112070c69315c81639066ce -- AGENTS.mdFocused shell assertions verified the exact sentence, one-line/no-deletion delta, Section 7 placement, absence at base, single occurrence at target, and single-parent commit shape.qlmanage -t -s 1200 -o /var/folders/5x/4nqprlbx0518k3ybcb1sz6gr0000gn/T/no-mistakes-evidence/01KYR3WYK9ZVBATYG443AWWHFN .../AGENTS-section-7-validation-rule.htmlVisually inspected the generated PNG at original resolution.git status --short✅ **Document** - passed
✅ No issues found.
✅ **Lint** - passed
✅ No issues found.
✅ **Push** - passed
✅ No issues found.