Skip to content

fix(web): lift the one sentence the type sweep missed - #103

Merged
jusso-dev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/readability-followup
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

fix(web): lift the one sentence the type sweep missed#103
jusso-dev merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/readability-followup

Conversation

@jusso-dev

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Follow-up to #102.

#100 and #101 landed after the typography branch was cut, so a little new copy arrived at the old size. Audited every text-xs text-muted-foreground in the files those PRs touched; exactly one was body copy rather than metadata: the empty task drawer's instruction, which is a sentence an operator reads on first landing.

Everything else stays at 12px on purpose — table cells, uppercase dt labels, timestamps, inbox counts, and the output hash. Those are metadata and should remain visually subordinate.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The empty task drawer landed after the typography pass, so its
instruction was still 12px. Counts, column headers, timestamps, and the
output hash stay at 12px deliberately — they are metadata.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@jusso-dev, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 39 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: cb9ec0be-0cf5-44c5-b5c4-76cbbe86b4a0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd65945 and c42f042.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/features/operations/operations-view.tsx

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jusso-dev
jusso-dev merged commit 2d38633 into main Jul 30, 2026
8 checks passed
@jusso-dev
jusso-dev deleted the fix/readability-followup branch July 30, 2026 05:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant