-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add is_convertible_without_narrowing
#54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
yaito3014
wants to merge
17
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
add-is-convertible-without-narrowing
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
384edff
Add `is_convertible_without_narrowing`
yaito3014 37bf953
Add test
yaito3014 6443dfa
Styling fix
yaito3014 65e4638
Fix for MSVC
yaito3014 9ba01d3
Refactor `aggregate_initialize_overload` using `is_convertible_withou…
yaito3014 0b16dda
Add edge cases
yaito3014 1a0b140
Add `is_assignable_without_narrowing`
yaito3014 1a35a62
Add clarification
yaito3014 8a4f052
Revert `is_assignable_without_narrowing` related change
yaito3014 b9c6216
Cleanup
yaito3014 cdec1b1
Refine `is_convertible_without_narrowing`
yaito3014 daab5d1
MSVC workaround
yaito3014 1380b7e
Rename "aggregate_initialize" to "no_narrowing"
yaito3014 66ca64b
Rewrite const-west to east-const
yaito3014 de99433
Add element-to-array test for `is_convertible_without_narrowing`
yaito3014 c378972
Revert "Rename "aggregate_initialize" to "no_narrowing""
yaito3014 80ad201
Rename "aggregate_initialize" to "no_narrowing" v2
yaito3014 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the first parameter
Tican be omitted, as it existed for checkingis_convertibleby passing-by-valueUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, the
Tiparameter cannot be omitted, since we should consider overload resolution forTiincluding implicit conversion sequence's priority.For example, constructing
rvariant<int, long>fromintshould be resolved toindex() == 0though bothintandlongare equally convertible fromintwithout narrowing. This is because identity conversion should occur prior to integral promotion in standard conversion.