⚡ Bolt: Use XFlush instead of XSync in drw_map#180
⚡ Bolt: Use XFlush instead of XSync in drw_map#180google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
Conversation
Using XSync forces a round-trip to the X server, blocking the client until the server processes the request. For frequent drawing operations like drw_map, this introduces unnecessary latency. XFlush ensures the request is sent without waiting for a response, significantly improving responsiveness during updates.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
💡 What: Replaced
XSync(drw->dpy, False)withXFlush(drw->dpy)indrw_map.🎯 Why:
XSyncblocks the client until the X server processes the request, creating a performance bottleneck in drawing paths.drw_mapis used for copying pixmaps to windows, which does not require synchronous confirmation.📊 Impact: Reduces latency in UI updates (bar redrawing, window title updates) by eliminating blocking round-trips.
🔬 Measurement: Verified that the application builds correctly with
make clean && make. No logic changes beyond synchronization method.PR created automatically by Jules for task 16795836906062345116 started by @paperbenni