Skip to content

fix: correct code block indentation in InitiaJS quickstart#158

Open
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mintlify/5a14c9d8
Open

fix: correct code block indentation in InitiaJS quickstart#158
mintlify[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
mintlify/5a14c9d8

Conversation

@mintlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mintlify mintlify Bot commented May 18, 2026

Summary

Fixes broken code block formatting in the "Test Installation" step of the InitiaJS quickstart, where the inner code fences were inconsistently indented relative to the enclosing <Step> component.

Changes

  • Align the ts and bash code blocks (and their fences) to the 4-space indentation used by the surrounding <Step> content
  • Reflow the example (async () => …)() IIFE onto multiple lines so it stays consistent with the new indentation
  • Add a blank line before the </Step> closing tag so the step renders cleanly

Context

A repo-wide pass for spelling, grammar, duplicate words, malformed links, broken frontmatter, and unbalanced markdown fences turned up only this one formatting issue. mint validate, mint broken-links, and prettier --check . all pass.


Note

Low Risk
Low risk documentation-only change that adjusts Markdown formatting and code snippet layout without affecting runtime behavior.

Overview
Fixes broken rendering in developers/developer-guides/tools/sdks/initia-js/quickstart.mdx by reindenting the ts and bash fenced code blocks within the “Test Installation” step to match the surrounding <Step> content.

Also reformats the async IIFE example onto multiple lines and adds spacing so the step content and fences parse cleanly.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 211ff11. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@mintlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mintlify Bot commented May 18, 2026

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
initia-docs 🟢 Ready View Preview May 18, 2026, 12:15 AM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants