Update `clap` Rust crates by hash-worker[bot] · Pull Request #8409 · hashintel/hash

hash-worker · 2026-02-12T00:42:12Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
clap	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.57` -> `4.5.59`
clap_builder	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.57` -> `4.5.59`
clap_complete	workspace.dependencies	patch	`4.5.65` -> `4.5.66`

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

Release Notes

clap-rs/clap (clap)

`v4.5.59`

Compare Source

Fixes

Command::ignore_errors no longer masks help/version on subcommands

`v4.5.58`

Compare Source

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

vercel · 2026-02-12T00:42:14Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 17, 2026 9:37am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 17, 2026 9:37am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 17, 2026 9:37am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 17, 2026 9:37am

cursor · 2026-02-12T00:42:19Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency bumps; low risk outside of potential platform-specific (Windows) build/runtime differences from updated transitive crates.

Overview
Updates Rust CLI dependency versions by bumping clap/clap_builder to 4.5.59 and clap_complete to 4.5.66, including clap_lex to 1.0.0.

The Cargo.lock refresh also changes several transitive Windows-related dependencies (notably windows-sys versions used by multiple crates).

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 93ef67a. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-02-12T00:42:57Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This Renovate PR updates the Rust CLI dependency clap (and related crates) to the latest patch releases.

Changes:

Bumps clap and clap_builder from 4.5.57 to 4.5.58
Bumps clap_complete from 4.5.65 to 4.5.66
Updates the resolved dependency set in Cargo.lock accordingly

Technical Notes: No source-code changes are included; risk is primarily around build/runtime compatibility and should be covered by CI and any CLI argument parsing tests.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-02-12T00:46:43Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.80%. Comparing base (7d0f697) to head (93ef67a).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8409   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.80%   60.80%           
=======================================
  Files        1273     1273           
  Lines      124456   124456           
  Branches     5354     5354           
=======================================
  Hits        75670    75670           
  Misses      47902    47902           
  Partials      884      884

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`7.78% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`27.20% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`81.33% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`68.54% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.10% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`90.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-02-12T00:47:28Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

_{Comparing deps/rs/clap-rust-crates (93ef67a) with main (7d0f697)}

12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

github-actions · 2026-02-17T10:39:51Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.960 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.892 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.369 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.639 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.749 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.480 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.226 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$56.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 902 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.650 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$88.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$285 \mathrm{ms} \pm 795 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.652 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.439 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.806 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.690 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 286 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 256 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.505 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 369 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$89.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 413 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 526 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.527 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 554 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 457 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 476 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 483 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 509 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.014 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.701 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.344 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 527 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$598 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge February 12, 2026 00:42

github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Feb 12, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 12, 2026 00:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 12, 2026 00:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 12, 2026 00:47 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 12, 2026 00:56 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested a review from a team February 12, 2026 01:03

hashdotai assigned TimDiekmann Feb 12, 2026

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/clap-rust-crates branch from b708276 to 1e20ad6 Compare February 16, 2026 22:52

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 16, 2026 22:55 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 16, 2026 22:55 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 16, 2026 22:56 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 16, 2026 23:06 View deployment

Update clap Rust crates

93ef67a

hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/rs/clap-rust-crates branch from 1e20ad6 to 93ef67a Compare February 17, 2026 09:26

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 17, 2026 09:28 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 17, 2026 09:29 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 17, 2026 09:30 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 17, 2026 09:37 View deployment

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update `clap` Rust crates#8409

Update `clap` Rust crates#8409
hash-worker[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
deps/rs/clap-rust-crates

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Release Notes

v4.5.59

Fixes

v4.5.58

Configuration

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

hash-worker bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`v4.5.59`

`v4.5.58`

vercel bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 12, 2026 •

edited

Loading