Update tool pipx:sqlfluff to v3.5.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
pipx:sqlfluff (changelog)	3.4.2 -> 3.5.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

sqlfluff/sqlfluff (pipx:sqlfluff)

v3.5.0

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 57.84%. Comparing base (3813458) to head (d514460).
⚠️ Report is 208 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8121      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.84%   57.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1167     1167              
  Lines      109264   109264              
  Branches     4976     4976              
==========================================
- Hits        63209    63208       -1     
- Misses      45309    45310       +1     
  Partials      746      746              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.89% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.59% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	49.36% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.46% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	83.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Nov 30, 2025 2:16pm

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$32.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.66 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-77.899 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.085 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 481 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$43.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.941 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$499 \mathrm{ms} \pm 987 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$99.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$292 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 364 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.375 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$30.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 271 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$9.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$58.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$64.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.405 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$81.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$87.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$59.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.384 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.616 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$70.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.987 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$71.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$140 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.140 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-60.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$604 \mathrm{ms} \pm 972 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[hash-worker]

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update (3.5.0). You will get a PR once a newer version is released. To ignore this dependency forever, add it to the ignoreDeps array of your Renovate config.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.