Skip to content

Conversation

@suztomo
Copy link
Member

@suztomo suztomo commented Feb 2, 2026

Bug ID: b/479543683

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @suztomo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a bug by updating the default code ownership for Python-related files. It replaces an outdated team alias with the current cloud-sdk-python-team in the CODEOWNERS file, ensuring that pull requests affecting these areas are routed to the correct and active team for review, thereby streamlining the review process and maintaining accurate team assignments.

Highlights

  • CODEOWNERS Update: The default Python team responsible for code reviews has been updated in the .github/CODEOWNERS file. The old team @googleapis/python-core-client-libraries has been replaced with @googleapis/cloud-sdk-python-team.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the .github/CODEOWNERS file to replace an old team alias with a new one. The change replaces @googleapis/python-core-client-libraries with @googleapis/cloud-sdk-python-team as a default owner. This is a straightforward configuration update to ensure the correct team is notified for code reviews. The change is consistent with the pull request's title and appears to be a simple maintenance task.

@suztomo suztomo marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2026 18:18
@suztomo suztomo requested review from a team as code owners February 2, 2026 18:18
@suztomo suztomo enabled auto-merge (squash) February 2, 2026 18:24
@suztomo suztomo merged commit 4dc5095 into googleapis:main Feb 2, 2026
27 checks passed
@suztomo suztomo deleted the replace-python-team branch February 3, 2026 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants