Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
🚀 New build available for commit |
|
🚀 New build available for commit |
|
I love this feature! Chef's kiss. It even keeps track if I select multiple wavefronts, change a zernike checkbox and hit recompute. It properly keeps track of which wavefronts were modified and which weren't. There is a minor feature/bug however: If I have 2 wavefronts, one was computed with spherical zernike checked and one without. I can click on the two wavefronts one at a time and I can see which one was calculated with and without. however if I select both wavefronts then it matters which I select last. Should there be a third symbol when it's mixed? With software installers there are checkboxes that can be checked, unchecked, or there is a 3rd symbol to indicate that some of the sub features are checked and some are not. I don't want to change the checkboxes here but the "+" and "-" symbols perhaps to a third symbol "." or "*". |
|
Are you going to try to add a third symbol @atsju? |
|
yes it sounds like an excellent idea. more generally, I had in mind to fix lot of little identified issues but at low pace. Just let me know if you have release in mind. |
2 participants
This one also improves #152 . We can probably do it differently and with better visuals but it's enough to validate the intent.
Just let me know.
you will notice small + and - before the zernike names.
It makes it much clearer witch zernike have been used to display a given waveform and what would change if hitting compute button.