C++: Update expected test results after extractor changes

[jketema]

No description provided.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates expected test results in C++ query tests to reflect changes in how the extractor formats floating-point numbers. The extractor now uses scientific notation (e.g., 3.5E15) instead of full decimal representation (e.g., 3500000000000000.0) for large numbers, and shorter decimal representations (e.g., 2.71828) instead of high-precision formats (e.g., 2.71828000000000003) for regular floating-point values.

Changes:

• Updated floating-point literal representations to use scientific notation for large values
• Updated floating-point literal representations to use shorter decimal formats for regular values
• Added sequential line numbers where they were previously missing in test expectations

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Likely Bugs/Underspecified Functions/MistypedFunctionArguments.expected	Updated floating-point literal formats and added missing line numbers for test expectations
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/rangeanalysis/SimpleRangeAnalysis/nrOfBounds.expected	Updated floating-point literal formats to shorter decimal representations and added missing line numbers
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/controlflow/guards/GuardsEnsure.expected	Updated floating-point literal format for small scientific notation value and added missing line numbers
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/controlflow/guards/GuardsCompare.expected	Updated floating-point literal format for small scientific notation value and added missing line numbers
cpp/ql/test/library-tests/builtins/complex/builtin.expected	Updated floating-point literal formats to shorter decimal representations and added missing line numbers

[geoffw0]

Looks great! (assuming tests pass on the corresponding branch)

[jketema]

assuming tests pass on the corresponding branch

They do.

[IdrissRio]

LGTM 👍