Skip to content

Conversation

@crankynetman
Copy link
Collaborator

I realized I didn't properly follow the pattern for our multi-instance scram thing with celery. Now, we do!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Pytest Celery Scheduler Coverage

File Coverage
All files 100%

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 8a02f90

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Django Pytest/Behave Coverage

File Coverage
All files 83%
config/consumers.py 78%
config/urls.py 69%
config/settings/base.py 69%
config/settings/local.py 72%
scram/route_manager/admin.py 71%
scram/route_manager/models.py 79%
scram/route_manager/views.py 88%
scram/route_manager/api/serializers.py 92%
scram/route_manager/api/views.py 76%
scram/shared/shared_code.py 56%
scram/templates/403.html 91%
scram/templates/404.html 91%
scram/templates/base.html 99%

Minimum allowed coverage is 50%

Generated by 🐒 cobertura-action against 8a02f90

@crankynetman crankynetman merged commit d110202 into main Feb 6, 2026
18 of 20 checks passed
@crankynetman crankynetman deleted the topic/chriscummings/cleanup-celery-vars branch February 6, 2026 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants