Skip to content
convictionalPublic

About

Convictional research experiments

Resources

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

68 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Research Experiments

This directory is the research log of Convictional and spans approximately 2024 to mid-2026.

What follows is roughly two years of applied LLM research, kept as ~50 self-contained "mini codebases". Some are substantial engineering efforts; some are a single markdown file recording what was tried and what happened. The research largely explores applied AI for knowledge work (e.g. deep research), knowledge-retrieval and structures for RAG, and goal-alignment of knowledge-work teams. No attempt has been made to tidy them into one.

Read this before you read anything else

These are point-in-time experiments and none of them are maintained. Each was written against the model versions, prices, libraries, and product assumptions of the week it was run. Dates in this directory run from roughly 2024 through mid-2026. Model comparisons in particular go stale fast — treat every benchmark number as a snapshot, not a current claim.

The input data has been removed. Almost every experiment here ran against Convictional's own production data: meeting transcripts, decision records, goal boards, email, engineering activity. That data contained personal information about employees, customers, and third parties, and it was deleted before publication rather than anonymized. Where a writeup quoted real content, the quote has been replaced with a clearly-labelled synthetic equivalent, and the substitution is noted in place. Consequence: most experiments here cannot be reproduced from this repository. You can read the method and the code; you cannot re-run the result. Individual READMEs say what is missing.

Nothing here was production code. No test coverage requirements and minimal maintainability needs, code reviews focused on design, consistentcy testing and interpretation. There was little architectural consistency across experiments. Several experiments contain approaches that were tried and abandoned, which is the point of keeping them.

Layout

Each subdirectory is one experiment or one group of related experiments. They are independent: a subdirectory may be a full mini-codebase with its own pyproject.toml, or just SQL queries, or just writing. The only convention is a per-directory README.md describing what it is.

common/ holds shared helpers (LLM clients, prompt templating, embeddings, IO) that several of the Python experiments import.

CLAUDE.md files scattered through the tree are instructions for AI coding agents working in this repo. They are kept because they document conventions, and because a lot of this code was written with agent assistance.

Running something

Most experiments will not run without the data that was removed, and many need cloud credentials. With that caveat:

Prerequisites

  • Python (see requires-python in pyproject.toml) and uv.
  • For anything touching BigQuery or Vertex AI, the gcloud CLI, authenticated.
  • API keys for whichever providers a given experiment uses (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google).

Some experiments store large files (figures, graphs, CSVs) with Git LFS. Install it and run git lfs install before cloning if you want those, otherwise you will get pointer files:

brew install git-lfs   # or your platform's package manager
git lfs install

Configuration

Copy the example environment file and fill in what you need:

cp .env.example .env

Put credentials in a separate .env.secrets file in this directory — it is gitignored and is never committed:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=...
OPENAI_API_KEY=...
GOOGLE_API_KEY=...

Both files are optional as far as make is concerned; individual experiments will fail with a clear error if a key they need is missing.

Commands

From this directory:

make install                                    # install dependencies, create the venv
make auth                                       # authenticate with Google Cloud
make run_experiment ARGS="knowledge_graphs"      # run an experiment's __main__.py
make help                                        # list targets

make run_experiment relies on the experiment having a __main__.py entrypoint. Experiments with their own pyproject.toml (geo-analyzer, alignsim, graphify_exploration, and others) have their own Makefile or CLI instead — see their READMEs.

Dependencies are managed with uv against the shared pyproject.toml here. A few experiments needed conflicting versions and so carry their own.

About

Convictional research experiments

Resources

Stars

4 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Used by

Contributors

Languages