[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate

[pre-commit-ci]

updates:

• github.com/abravalheri/validate-pyproject: v0.25 → 0.26
• github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.16.2 → v0.16.7
• github.com/rohaquinlop/complexipy-pre-commit: v6.2.0 → v8.0.1

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

• Update pre-commit hooks for validate-pyproject, Ruff, and complexipy to their latest configured releases.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.pre-commit-config.yaml	45% smaller

[codereviewbot-ai]

🤖 Review skipped: reviews for bot-created pull requests are not allowed on free accounts. Upgrade to a paid plan to enable bot reviews.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

This PR updates the versions of the ruff and complexipy pre-commit hooks to their latest tagged releases without changing any hook configuration or behavior in the project’s .pre-commit-config.yaml file.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Upgrade the ruff pre-commit hook to the next patch release.	Bump the ruff-pre-commit repo revision from v0.16.2 to v0.16.3 in the pre-commit configuration Keep existing ruff-check and ruff-format hooks and options unchanged	.pre-commit-config.yaml
Upgrade the complexipy pre-commit hook to the latest major release.	Bump the complexipy-pre-commit repo revision from v6.2.0 to v7.0.1 in the pre-commit configuration Retain the existing complexipy hook definition and exclusion pattern	.pre-commit-config.yaml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Upgraded ruff-pre-commit hook version
  The version of our ruff-pre-commit hook has been updated from v0.16.2 to v0.16.3. This upgrade carries minor improvements and bug fixes which will help us maintain the quality of our code.

• Upgraded complexipy-pre-commit hook version
  The version of our complexipy-pre-commit hook has been boosted from v6.2.0 to v7.0.1. This significant upgrade brings an array of new features and improvements that will increase our code's efficiency and reliability while minimizing errors and complications.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

[mergify]

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

• Queue this pull request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.95%. Comparing base (09bf59b) to head (1ced929).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #552   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.95%   99.95%           
========================================
  Files           90       90           
  Lines         7160     7160           
  Branches       172      172           
========================================
  Hits          7157     7157           
  Misses           2        2           
  Partials         1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[llamapreview]

LlamaPReview — Conditional code-review clear

Exact-head CI remains unresolved (3 failed); no CI-dependent merge-safety claim is made.

Review details and evidence

Material unknowns

• Why the static-tests (3.12) job fails on this exact head, and whether that job is a required merge condition. If fetched workflows showed the updated pre-commit hooks cause this failure, the verdict would change to require changes.
  • Check: Check whether the static-tests (3.12) workflow invokes pre-commit and, if so, confirm the failure is unrelated to this hook bump.

---

LlamaPReview reviewed this pull request at its exact head commit. Inspect the source or share feedback.

[codereviewbot-ai]

🤖 Review skipped: reviews for bot-created pull requests are not allowed on free accounts. Upgrade to a paid plan to enable bot reviews.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery assessment

Approved.

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codereviewbot-ai]

🤖 Review skipped: reviews for bot-created pull requests are not allowed on free accounts. Upgrade to a paid plan to enable bot reviews.

[codereviewbot-ai]

🤖 Review skipped: reviews for bot-created pull requests are not allowed on free accounts. Upgrade to a paid plan to enable bot reviews.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 8ac96f5a-29a6-4829-b8ea-b963bab73f20

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codescene-access]

No application code in the PR — skipped Code Health checks.

See analysis details in CodeScene

Quality Gate Profile: Customizable Safeguards
Install CodeScene MCP: safeguard and uplift AI-generated code. Catch issues early with our IDE extension and CLI tool.

[codereviewbot-ai]

🤖 Review skipped: reviews for bot-created pull requests are not allowed on free accounts. Upgrade to a paid plan to enable bot reviews.