Skip to content

fix: update ctutils for new timing advisory - #523

Merged
cagojeiger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-ctutils-audit
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

cagojeiger merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/fix-ctutils-audit

Conversation

@cagojeiger

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The RustSec advisory database published RUSTSEC-2026-0385 after the preceding main audit passed. The required audit now rejects ctutils 0.4.2 for non-constant-time mask generation and u128 comparisons.

Update only the locked ctutils patch release to 0.4.4, which RustSec identifies as fixed. Cargo manifests, every other locked package and ctutils dependencies remain unchanged. Keep all existing audit policy and exceptions unchanged.

Sources: https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/blob/f7b2f6bc663452200bbe639ebb75e0c762b3422b/crates/ctutils/RUSTSEC-2026-0385.md and RustCrypto/utils#1569.

Validation:

  • cargo update -p ctutils --precise 0.4.4 changed only its version and checksum.
  • Parsed lockfile comparison confirms all other package fields and metadata are unchanged.
  • cargo tree --locked resolves ctutils 0.4.4.
  • cargo audit 0.22.2 --deny yanked --json passed with zero vulnerabilities; three existing unmaintained warnings remain.
  • git diff --check passed. Full Linux CI is pending.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-23T08:38:45.030944Z 7e90376 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@cagojeiger
cagojeiger merged commit f3837c9 into main Oct 23, 2026
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant