⚡ Bolt: [performance] Optimize computed property short-circuiting#353
⚡ Bolt: [performance] Optimize computed property short-circuiting#353acebytes wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… use `.contains(where:)`. Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Closing as duplicate. The Bolt bot has opened many PRs for the same lazy-filter / short-circuit / array-allocation optimizations in |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
💡 What: Refactored
selectedSizeto use.lazy.filterandhasSelectionto use.contains(where:)in CacheoutViewModel.🎯 Why: To prevent unnecessary intermediate array allocations and O(N) complete traversals when simply checking if an item is selected.
📊 Impact: Eliminates memory churn in SwiftUI computed properties during renders and reduces evaluation from O(N) to O(1) in best-case scenarios for
hasSelection.🔬 Measurement: Verify memory allocations via Instruments and ensure selection updates in UI remain responsive.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 6350754441984963300 started by @acebytes