docs(infra): point the removed image check at #1045

[DorianZheng]

Both comments left by #1120 read as though /api/config was never meant to
carry an image list — "has no such field, and never has", "a contract the
API does not implement". That is true of the code today and wrong about
the intent: #1045 specifies supportedImages on that response, down to
the same alias and ref the removed check asserted, and it is still open.

Left as-is, the next reader concludes the field was a mistake rather than
that the check outran the API work. Both comments now name #1045 as what
reinstates the comparison and #1119 as why it went away.

Comment text only; git diff -U0 reports no changed executable line.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated internal comments to clarify the planned system-image comparison behavior and its relationship to the configuration API.
  • Added historical context and issue references for the unavailable supported-images field.

[boxlite-agent]

📦 BoxLite review — couldn't complete

claude exited 1

stdout:
{"is_error":true,"duration_api_ms":0,"num_turns":1,"stop_reason":"stop_sequence","session_id":"b5dd9505-883d-4e49-a975-91de9ec150ff","total_cost_usd":0,"usage":{"input_tokens":0,"cache_creation_input_tokens":0,"cache_read_input_tokens":0,"output_tokens":0,"server_tool_use":{"web_search_requests":0,"web_fetch_requests":0},"service_tier":"standard","cache_creation":{"ephemeral_1h_input_tokens":0,"ephemeral_5m_input_tokens":0},"inference_geo":"","iterations":[],"speed":"standard"},"modelUsage":{},"permission_denials":[],"terminal_reason":"api_error","fast_mode_state":"off","fast_mode_disabled_reason":"sdk_opt_in_required","subtype":"success","api_error_status":403,"result":"Your organization has disabled Claude subscription access for Claude Code · Use an Anthropic API key instead, or ask your admin to enable access","type":"result","duration_ms":781,"uuid":"d8c752e4-d619-4c35-8007-762190c6984e"}

stderr:
<empty>

_{powered by BoxLite}

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 60a20c4e-93bc-4959-b1d0-30050e84f8a2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between caeff69 and d217bf3.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• apps/infra/scripts/deployment-environment.mjs
• apps/infra/scripts/proxy-deployment-verify.test.mjs

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates comments in deployment and proxy verification scripts. The comments document deferred system-image comparison, related API issues, and the handling of legacy BOXLITE_SYSTEM_IMAGES values.

Changes

System-image verification documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Clarify deferred image verification apps/infra/scripts/deployment-environment.mjs, apps/infra/scripts/proxy-deployment-verify.test.mjs	Comments now describe the pending /api/config image-list field, related issues, the premature image comparison, and unsupported assertions for legacy image values.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• boxlite-ai/boxlite#1007: Established the systemImages API configuration referenced by the updated comments.
• boxlite-ai/boxlite#1027: Updated behavior around the supportedImages API field and system-image allowlisting.
• boxlite-ai/boxlite#1120: Modified the same deployment verification files and related image-list documentation.

Suggested reviewers: ltstriker

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the intent and scope but omits the required Call graph, Changes, and How to verify sections.	Add the required template headings, include the before-and-after call graph, list the notable changes, and provide a reviewer verification step.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the documentation change and the issue that restores the removed image check.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/point-image-check-at-1045

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}