docs: retract the aksops +14% (iso-accuracy violation)#16
Merged
Conversation
A --rollouts 6 re-run showed the aksops JIT arm succeeds only 2/6 (baseline 6/6), so the earlier +14% (from a lucky 3/3 at rollouts 3) was a mean over a different, smaller success set — not iso-accuracy, and not a valid win. Rewrites the TL;DR and the aksops section: no shape shows a valid JIT win; ops/tool-use remains the promising-but-unconfirmed hypothesis, blocked on a fixture where both arms succeed reliably (the mock stubs currently make the agent short-circuit). Adds the lesson: compare at iso-accuracy and check the verified sample size on BOTH arms before believing a mean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
I reported
aksopsas a +14% JIT win from a--rollouts 3run. A--rollouts 6re-run shows that was a small-sample artifact and it is retracted.The "saving" was a mean over a different, smaller success set — not iso-accuracy, so not a valid comparison. The rollouts=3 run got lucky (JIT 3/3). The
aksopsfixture is flaky for the agent (it notices the mock stubs are fake and sometimes short-circuits).What this changes
aj bench --comparealready prints an iso-accuracy WARN; I bypassed it in a JSON post-process and misled myself.)Docs-only; corrects a claim already on
main(from #15).🤖 Generated with Claude Code