chore: record upstream sync up to 91a03e07 (no tree change)#78
Merged
Conversation
…#2364) Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]>
OpenCode can leave the long-lived serve child in the spawned process group after the wrapper exits. Provider refresh owns only a scoped inventory probe, so cleanup targets that local process group when the refresh scope closes. Constraint: Keep active OpenCode thread sessions scoped to their own session lifecycle. Rejected: Disable provider refresh | would hide model and auth state changes. Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Tested: bun run test src/provider/Layers/OpenCodeProvider.test.ts src/provider/Layers/OpenCodeAdapter.test.ts Tested: bun fmt Tested: bun lint Tested: bun typecheck Tested: bun run build:desktop
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…gdotgg#1293) Co-authored-by: Murat Aslan <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…2419) Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…tgg#2423) Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.7 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…layout fixes (pingdotgg#2392) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
) Co-authored-by: Claude Haiku 4.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…gdotgg#2431) Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cursor[bot] <206951365+cursor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cursor[bot] <206951365+cursor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]>
…#2361) Co-authored-by: codex <[email protected]>
…gg#2473) Co-authored-by: Julius Marminge <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: cursor[bot] <206951365+cursor[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Already-integrated upstream commits 91a03e0 and earlier were merged into this fork via PR #75 and PR #77 as a manual reconciliation, so git's merge-base never advanced and GitHub still reports this fork as ~38 commits behind upstream/main even though the content is in tree. This is a no-tree-change merge (-s ours) that records 91a03e0 as a parent so the merge-base advances. After this lands, the next upstream sync only has to deal with the genuinely new commits since 91a03e0.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
PRs #75 and #77 brought every upstream commit through
91a03e07into this fork as a manual reconciliation rather than a truegit merge, so git's merge-base never advanced. GitHub still reports this fork as ~38 commits behindpingdotgg/t3code:maineven though the content is already in tree.This is a
git merge -s ours 91a03e07— a no-tree-change merge that records91a03e07as a second parent so the merge-base advances. After this lands, the GitHub "behind" count drops from 46 → 8, and the next upstream sync only has to deal with the genuinely new commits since91a03e07.What this changes
mainHEAD and upstream91a03e07.main.Verification
Test plan
git diff main..HEAD --statreturns empty (no tree change)git log upstream/main ^HEADreturns 8 (the genuinely new commits)