feat(semconv): add conventional pull request action - #1
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
|
Understand this PR’s impact Explore downstream dependencies and potential security impact with Blast Radius. Preview blast radius → · Advanced feature Warning Review limit reachedNext included review available in 53 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Free Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
TrogonStack is on CodeRabbit Free, which includes PR summaries. Ask your admin to upgrade for code reviews.
ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Free Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. WalkthroughThe change adds lint CI for workflows and shell scripts, updates semantic validation to inspect pull request titles through ChangesRepository Validation
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes A rabbit checks each title line Comment |
Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
7bb95cd to
fc80cb6
Compare
Only the pull request title reaches the default branch on a squash merge, and a maintained upstream already validates it better than a local grammar can. What this repository adds is one pinned version and one type list for every consumer. Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
…ository Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
A task file whose path mirrors the workflow that calls it makes the pairing obvious from either side. Signed-off-by: Yordis Prieto <yordis.prieto@gmail.com>
pull_request_targetis deliberate: underpull_requestthe workflow file comes from the head, so the check could be rewritten by the change it is checking. It stays safe only while this job never checks out or executes pull request content, which is stated in the action and in its README.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmithwith what you need. Autofix is disabled.