Skip to content

fix(deps): update dependency body-parser to v1.20.6 [security] - #587

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-body-parser-vulnerability
Open

fix(deps): update dependency body-parser to v1.20.6 [security]#587
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/npm-body-parser-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
body-parser 1.20.31.20.6 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


body-parser vulnerable to denial of service when invalid limit value silently disables size enforcement

CVE-2026-12590 / GHSA-v422-hmwv-36x6

More information

Details

Impact

When body-parser is configured with an invalid limit option value, such as an unparseable string or NaN, bytes.parse() returns null and the request body size check is silently skipped. Applications that rely on limit as their primary safeguard against oversized request bodies will accept arbitrarily large payloads, leading to excessive memory and CPU usage and denial of service.

This issue affects applications that pass a programmatically computed or user-configurable value to the limit option without validating it first.

Patches

This issue is fixed in body-parser@2.3.0 and body-parser@1.20.6 via #​698. After the fix, invalid limit values throw a clear error at parser construction time instead of silently disabling enforcement. null and undefined continue to fall back to the default limit (100kb).

Workarounds

Validate limit before passing it to body-parser. For example, parse the value with bytes.parse() at startup and reject any configuration where it returns null or a non-finite number.

References

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 3.7 / 10 (Low)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

expressjs/body-parser (body-parser)

v1.20.6

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: expressjs/body-parser@1.20.5...1.20.6

v1.20.5

Compare Source

What's Changed

The reason for this release is a fix to the extended urlencoded parser returning objects instead of arrays for large array inputs (> 100) on qs@​6.14.2+. (#​716)

New Contributors

Special thanks to triager @​krzysdz for keeping this on our radar and effectively triaging the specific issue!

Full Changelog: expressjs/body-parser@1.20.4...1.20.5

v1.20.4

Compare Source

===================

  • deps: qs@~6.14.0
  • deps: use tilde notation for dependencies
  • deps: http-errors@~2.0.1
  • deps: raw-body@~2.5.3

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build Report

badge

Please note:

  1. Files only stay for around 14 days!
  2. This comment will be updated with the data of the last successful build of this PR.
Name Link
Commit 5109fa1
Logs https://github.com/SAP/app-studio-toolkit/actions/runs/32966514173
VSIX Files https://github.com/SAP/app-studio-toolkit/actions/runs/32966514173/artifacts/9605970747

@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-body-parser-vulnerability branch from 2e548a9 to ffff608 Compare August 26, 2026 12:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants