Skip to content

Conversation

@nhossaincse
Copy link

I am doing research on evaluating automated conversion of CI configurations from Travis CI to GitHub Actions. As part of this study, a GitHub Actions workflow has been generated that aims to approximate the existing Travis CI configuration as closely as possible.
Even if you do not have plans to actually migrate to GitHub Actions, I would greatly appreciate it if you could give me some feedback on how well this migrated workflow reflects the original configuration. You may also give me your opinion in a five-point rating; it would be very helpful for the study. I just added the .yml file, and it has passed (green) on my end. Thank you.

@nhossaincse
Copy link
Author

Dear Authors,

I wanted to follow up on the PR.

I understand reviewing research PRs may not be a priority, but even brief feedback on how well the converted workflow captures your original Travis CI configuration would be incredibly helpful for my study. A simple 1-5 rating would be great and highly appreciated.

Thank you.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant