You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
A crash-left branch-removal temp file from a pre-#3763 dev build could revive a cancelled removal #3773
#3763 counts a crash-left `removal-pending`.partial as an owed branch removal, because the crash can leave that temp file alone after the drop has already removed the app.
Builds of main between #3600 (merged 2026-10-29) and #3763 had a gap. If one of those builds left a .partial from a crash, and its next drop of the app used keepBranches, that drop cleared only the marker. Upgrading such a node to #3763 would then read the leftover .partial as owed, and delete forks the operator chose to keep.
No release can reach this: v5.4.0-alpha.1 came out before #3600 merged, and #3600 has no backport. Only a node that ran a development build of main in that window, crashed mid-write during a discarding drop, then dropped again with keepBranches, and was upgraded in place could hit it.
If it ever matters
Give the record a drop writes afterremoveApplication its own temp file name, and count only that name as owed. A .partial with the original name would then never authorize a removal.
Activity