GH-343 fix: block namespaced commands during combat and add regression test#343
GH-343 fix: block namespaced commands during combat and add regression test#343
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @vLuckyyy, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the command blocking mechanism during combat by introducing a specialized controller. This change enhances the accuracy and reliability of command restriction, particularly for namespaced commands, and improves testability by adding dedicated unit tests for the new logic. The overall impact is a more robust and maintainable system for managing player actions during combat. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses the issue of namespaced commands not being blocked during combat by refactoring the command checking logic into a new FightCommandController. The new implementation properly normalizes commands, stripping namespaces before checking them against the restricted list. The addition of unit tests for the new normalization and matching logic is a great improvement that ensures the fix is robust and prevents future regressions. My review includes a couple of suggestions: one important fix for a dependency in the build configuration and a minor performance improvement in the new controller.
...bat-plugin/src/main/java/com/eternalcode/combat/fight/controller/FightCommandController.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Jakubk15
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
2026-02-19.12-19-20.mp4
This doesn't seem to work correctly. When I define eternalcore:msg explicitly as the blocked message, I expect only the /msg from EternalCore to be blocked. Your behavior would be correct when I would block msg, without the namespace defined.
| static String normalizeCommand(String command) { | ||
| if (command == null || command.isBlank()) { | ||
| return EMPTY; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| String normalized = command.strip(); | ||
|
|
||
| if (normalized.charAt(0) == SLASH) { | ||
| normalized = normalized.substring(1).stripLeading(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (normalized.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return EMPTY; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| int colonIndex = normalized.indexOf(NAMESPACE_SEPARATOR); | ||
| int firstSpaceIndex = normalized.indexOf(SPACE); | ||
|
|
||
| if (colonIndex >= 0 && (firstSpaceIndex < 0 || colonIndex < firstSpaceIndex)) { | ||
| normalized = normalized.substring(colonIndex + 1); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return WHITESPACE_PATTERN.matcher(normalized).replaceAll(SINGLE_SPACE); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| static boolean matches(String command, List<String> restrictedCommands) { | ||
| if (command.isEmpty()) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (String restrictedCommand : restrictedCommands) { | ||
| String normalizedRestricted = normalizeCommand(restrictedCommand); | ||
|
|
||
| if (normalizedRestricted.isEmpty()) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| boolean exactMatch = command.equalsIgnoreCase(normalizedRestricted); | ||
| boolean prefixMatch = command.regionMatches(true, 0, normalizedRestricted, 0, normalizedRestricted.length()) | ||
| && command.length() > normalizedRestricted.length() | ||
| && command.charAt(normalizedRestricted.length()) == SPACE; | ||
|
|
||
| if (exactMatch || prefixMatch) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would consider move that logic to other class to improve SRP. Currently this class is not only "controller"
No description provided.