Expected Behavior
Exposing constructs for additional resource types
Actual Behavior
Currently the constructs that are exposed are for transferring the logs - layer, forwarder etc.
Hey!
Wanted to suggest that we'll add more constructs that will be used for more resource types on the cloud formation.
For example: monitor.
In order to create a datadog monitor using the cloud formation, you'll need to implement it by yourself or use unsupported/unofficial package that will contain that abstraction.
Users can use some packages that have been created by non-Datadog group, for example: see here, and it will work.
But if we do support all the resource types (that mentioned here), I don't see why there is no cdk constructs that supported and maintained by the official datadog github organization.
Maybe there is an idea behind not creating the cdk constructs that align with the available datadog cloudformation resources, but the fact that from simple search I've found 2 different packages (not official) that creates those constructs, it raised a flag.
Hope to here from you!
Expected Behavior
Exposing constructs for additional resource types
Actual Behavior
Currently the constructs that are exposed are for transferring the logs - layer, forwarder etc.
Hey!
Wanted to suggest that we'll add more constructs that will be used for more resource types on the cloud formation.
For example: monitor.
In order to create a datadog monitor using the cloud formation, you'll need to implement it by yourself or use unsupported/unofficial package that will contain that abstraction.
Users can use some packages that have been created by non-Datadog group, for example: see here, and it will work.
But if we do support all the resource types (that mentioned here), I don't see why there is no cdk constructs that supported and maintained by the official datadog github organization.
Maybe there is an idea behind not creating the cdk constructs that align with the available datadog cloudformation resources, but the fact that from simple search I've found 2 different packages (not official) that creates those constructs, it raised a flag.
Hope to here from you!