Skip to content

Update dependency DataDog/dd-apm-inject to v0.69.0-1 - #54605

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/datadog-dd-apm-inject-0.x
Aug 11, 2026
Merged

Update dependency DataDog/dd-apm-inject to v0.69.0-1#54605
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/datadog-dd-apm-inject-0.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
DataDog/dd-apm-inject minor 0.68.0-10.69.0-1

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Europe/Paris)

  • Branch creation
    • At 12:00 AM through 04:59 AM and 10:00 PM through 11:59 PM, Monday through Friday (* 0-4,22-23 * * 1-5)
    • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Aug 9, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested review from a team as code owners August 9, 2026 01:50
@renovate renovate Bot added the changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed label Aug 9, 2026
@renovate
renovate Bot requested a review from clarkb7 August 9, 2026 01:50
@renovate renovate Bot added dependencies PRs that bump a dependency qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation labels Aug 9, 2026
@dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c

dd-prapprover-prod-77c48c Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PRApprover will approve and merge this PR, FAQ, #dx-source-code-management

🛠️ PRApproval Status

  • ✅ PR is eligible for auto-approval by rule datadog-agent-renovate - 2026-08-10T22:06:08Z
  • ⬜ CI tests passed
  • ⬜ Approved
  • Manual merge required: this rule does not auto-merge.

➡️ Current phase: CI tests failed. Please fix the failing tests and rerun the workflow, click Workflow Link -> Workflow Starter Link -> Start Workflow

@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts Bot added the internal Identify a non-fork PR label Aug 9, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Aug 9, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor b1e8c38e:

Results for datadog-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.33.3006e38.pipeline.129819055-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

Results for datadog-iot-agent_7.84.0~devel.git.33.3006e38.pipeline.129819055-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes added the ask-review Ask in slack required teams to review this PR label Aug 10, 2026
@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-10 16:21:37 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-10 16:21:46 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

  • Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
  • Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-10 21:17:19 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-10 21:34:47 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-10 21:34:55 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

  • Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
  • Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-11 02:12:07 UTC ⚠️ MergeQueue: This merge request was unqueued

devflow unqueued this merge request: It did not become mergeable within the expected time

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes added the stop-updating Prevent auto updates from Renovate label Aug 10, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-11 06:36:40 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-11 06:36:48 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: Pull request is not mergeable yet

It will be processed automatically as soon as GitHub reports it as mergeable. View in MergeQueue UI.

  • Run /code blockers to see what is blocking it.
  • Run /remove to cancel it.

2026-08-11 07:46:08 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-08-11 08:34:17 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@coignetp
coignetp deployed to dependabot August 11, 2026 07:45 — with GitHub Actions Active
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-08-11 07:45:31 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-08-11 07:45:33 UTC ❌ MergeQueue

PR already in the queue with status waiting

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit cc47859 into main Aug 11, 2026
338 of 346 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the renovate/datadog-dd-apm-inject-0.x branch August 11, 2026 08:34
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 7.84.0 milestone Aug 11, 2026
@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: c4653e35-0bf9-4103-b8de-6119c3c7f2e3

Baseline: 1bf228d
Comparison: cc47859
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.48 [+0.24, +0.73] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory utilization +0.35 [+0.25, +0.45] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory utilization +0.07 [+0.03, +0.11] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.05 [-0.08, -0.01] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.05 [-0.10, +0.00] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory utilization -0.24 [-0.30, -0.18] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory utilization -0.67 [-0.79, -0.55] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -0.96 [-1.80, -0.12] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 148.25MiB ≤ 154MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle total_bytes_received 10/10 733.69KiB ≤ 819.20KiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 ≤ 4 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 494.68MiB ≤ 512MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features total_bytes_received 10/10 1.13MiB ≤ 1.25MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 18 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 184.47MiB ≤ 195MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 264.17MiB ≤ 292MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 368.96 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 19 ≤ 40 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 376.06MiB ≤ 430MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs total_bytes_received 10/10 0.94GiB ≤ 1.04GiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_private_action_runner memory_usage 10/10 71.22MiB ≤ 75MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle cpu_usage 10/10 28.03 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle memory_usage 10/10 301.89MiB ≤ 330MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 59.37 ≤ 200 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 277.85MiB ≤ 310MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load cpu_usage 10/10 20.11 ≤ 100 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load memory_usage 10/10 286.44MiB ≤ 320MiB bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Replicate Execution Details

We run multiple replicates for each experiment/variant. However, we allow replicates to be automatically retried if there are any failures, up to 8 times, at which point the replicate is marked dead and we are unable to run analysis for the entire experiment. We call each of these attempts at running replicates a replicate execution. This section lists all replicate executions that failed due to the target crashing or being oom killed.

Note: In the below tables we bucket failures by experiment, variant, and failure type. For each of these buckets we list out the replicate indexes that failed with an annotation signifying how many times said replicate failed with the given failure mode. In the below example the baseline variant of the experiment named experiment_with_failures had two replicates that failed by oom kills. Replicate 0, which failed 8 executions, and replicate 1 which failed 6 executions, all with the same failure mode.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Logs Debug Dashboard
experiment_with_failures baseline 0 (x8) 1 (x6) Oom killed Debug Dashboard

The debug dashboard links will take you to a debugging dashboard specifically designed to investigate replicate execution failures.

❌ Retried Profiling Replicate Execution Failures (ddprof)

Note: Profiling replicas may still be executing. See the debug dashboard for up to date status.

Experiment Variant Replicates Failure Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_idle comparison 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load baseline 10 Crashed (exit code: 134) Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load comparison 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard
quality_gate_security_no_fs_load baseline 10 Oom killed Debug Dashboard

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_private_action_runner, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_mean_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_security_no_fs_load, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check total_bytes_received: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ask-review Ask in slack required teams to review this PR changelog/no-changelog No changelog entry needed dependencies PRs that bump a dependency internal Identify a non-fork PR qa/no-code-change No code change in Agent code requiring validation short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly stop-updating Prevent auto updates from Renovate team/windows-products

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants