Docs: tool access belongs to the harness, not the panel - #67
Merged
Conversation
SKILL.md, README.md and CLAUDE.md all said lanes have no tools and no file access. That is true for the http and acp harnesses only. A cli lane runs the vendor's own CLI with its normal toolset, and will use it: on 2026-09-05 HAL9000 read the checkout instead of a stale brief, wrote a probe test into the reviewed repo, ran go test, and deleted it. State the actual policy: tool access is the default for cli lanes and is revoked per lane when one cheats. Tell operators to commit or snapshot before a round, never to commit while a cli lane runs, and to write the brief for the http lanes regardless, since a tree-aware review is not evidence of convergence with lanes that saw only the brief. Closes #66. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwxtwuoRxP75PdR6NAmMS3
|
Important
This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars. ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Team Run ID: Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
skill/SKILL.md,README.md(Limits) andCLAUDE.md(Scope) all said lanes have no tools and no file access. That is true for thehttpandacpharnesses only. Aclilane runs the vendor's own CLI (claude,agy) with its normal toolset, and will use it.Why now
On 2026-09-05, during a code-review round on a checked-out repo, the HAL9000 lane (
claude, opus) decided the brief was stale, read the working tree instead, createdzz_review_probe_test.goinside the reviewed repo, rango test, and deleted the file — while the operator had uncommitted work in that tree. The tree was verified byte-identical afterwards only because it had been snapshotted first. It also produced the best review of the round (probe-confirmed a real ordering bug).Policy, as stated by the owner
Tool access for
clilanes is the default and intended. A lane loses it when it cheats — reads another lane's answer, edits the code under review, games the question — via--safe-mode --disallowedTools …or an empty launch directory withCLAUDE_CODE_*scrubbed.Changes
http/acpin all three docs.git diff > snap.patch; git status --short --untracked-files=all > snap.status, compare after), never commit while aclilane runs, write the brief for thehttplanes regardless — a tree-aware review is not evidence of convergence with lanes that saw only the brief.BACKLOG.mdline for Docs claim lanes have no tools; cli lanes run the vendor CLI with its full toolset #66.Docs only; no code or config changes.
Closes #66.
Proudly Made in Nebraska. Go Big Red! 🌽 https://xkcd.com/2347/
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01BwxtwuoRxP75PdR6NAmMS3