Skip to content

Clarify modelling of parallel concessions (ResponsibilitySet, AuthorityRef and OperatorRef) #158

Description

@FlourishingData

While reviewing the modelling of lines operated under a parallel concession, it is unclear how responsibilities should be represented. The NeTEx model allows multiple ResponsibilityRoleAssignments within a ResponsibilitySet. Therefore, multiple organisations could potentially be assigned to the same role type (e.g. multiple entityLegalOwnership or operation assignments). At the same time, Line also provides AuthorityRef and OperatorRef references.

Questions

Please clarify the recommended modelling approach for a line that is associated with multiple authorities and/or multiple operators.

In particular:

  • Should multiple authorities be represented through multiple entityLegalOwnership assignments in a ResponsibilitySet?
  • Should multiple operators be represented through multiple operation assignments in a ResponsibilitySet?
  • Should multiple AuthorityRef and OperatorRef elements be used on the Line?
  • Which approach is considered normative and preferred?
  • How should a line with a parallel concession be represented?

Request

Please add documentation and an example covering a parallel concession and other mixing operator resp. authority scenarios and explaining the intended use of:

  • ResponsibilitySet
  • ResponsibilityRoleAssignment
  • AuthorityRef
  • OperatorRef

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status
In progress

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions