llama.cpp Discussions #23
MillionthOdin16
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
|
Just FYI, llama CPP received a big bug fix in the last hour that significantly improves token per second performance at large context lengths 🔥 |
1 reply
|
What version of llama.cpp is this python binding using? On my machine, the model load is 3 second using the llama.cpp but 40seconds using this python binding. |
1 reply
|
any way to bring "-n N, --n_predict N: number of tokens to predict" to python interface? without it, it only retrieves a fixed max number of words not the full content. it is defaulted at 128, but should be set at -1 for getting full content. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I created this as a place to discuss
llama.cppspecific info that doesn't directly require action for this repo, but is still related :)Performance wise, there's some cool stuff being investigated related to generation speed as the context grows. It looks like there's a significant drop in tokens/S, which was introduced in a last couple weeks. If they can find the cause, gen should be much faster :D
ggml-org/llama.cpp#603
All reactions