Skip to content

Compared to cub radix sort #2

Description

@LRLVEC

According to my test compared with cub device radix sort, the speed of this implemention is about 3 times slower than cub for 16<<20 uint32_t elements, which is about 4ms vs 1.3ms on RTX4090.

As far as I know, cub uses decoupled look back to improve the scan operation speed. Any interest on making this more efficient by switching to the sota scan algorithm?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions